Improve the Questions
Investigate what sits behind hesitation before assuming that greater awareness or stronger persuasion will solve it.
Strategic Leadership
Framework & Process Development
Audience Decision Framework
Portfolio overview
Creative Direction / Marketing Strategy
After several meetings with clients, a pattern emerged: uncertainty was making decisions harder. Rapid changes in technology, economic pressures, and competing demands were shaping how people evaluated opportunities and whether they felt ready to act.
That observation prompted research and a new question: what does advertising need to address before an audience can make a decision?
The Audience Decision Framework grew from that inquiry, adding another layer to our advertising approach. Alongside audience needs, motivations, and messaging, it considers readiness to decide: what creates hesitation, what builds confidence, and what makes a next step feel manageable.
The goal is to help teams create communications that meet people where they are and support an informed decision.
A concept paper for Hatcher Decision Architecture, a proposed research and strategy framework that connects audience mental models, trust, identity, perceived risk, and lived context with the conditions needed for informed decisions. It brings research, branding, UX, creative, communications, and integrated marketing into a shared approach.
A Glimpse of the Work
A compact view of the thinking and tools behind the work. Select the image to explore it.
Portfolio visual summary of the proposed Audience Decision Framework. The approach is awaiting piloting and validation.
Observation, research synthesis, and framework development: Reece Quiñones. Recurring client conversations prompted the inquiry. The concept translates established thinking about mental models, decision-making, and design into a proposed approach for communications teams.
The approach examines how people believe a choice or system works, what cues they trust, and where their understanding differs from available evidence. Those insights can inform messages, interfaces, experiences, trusted voices, and clearer pathways to action. Research may also reveal that the organization’s own assumptions or offering need to change.
The purpose is to improve informed choice while respecting autonomy, dignity, and belonging. A useful outcome might be clearer understanding, informed consideration, or a better match between a person and an opportunity.
The inquiry begins by separating an audience’s reasons to hesitate from the organization’s assumptions about those reasons. Research can examine what people understand, which sources they trust, what risks they perceive, and what would make a next step manageable. Those questions inform a proposed response that can be tested and refined. The framework remains a concept and a direction for validation.
A concept paper documenting the framework, proposed research products, and a path toward piloting and validation. It establishes a direction for testing how decision insight could improve communications and audience experiences.
From Analysis to Action
Investigate what sits behind hesitation before assuming that greater awareness or stronger persuasion will solve it.
Consider whether people need clearer information, credible evidence, a better experience, or a change in the offer itself.
Evaluate understanding and decision readiness while respecting people’s autonomy. These are intended uses, not measured outcomes.

Adapting Advertising to Audience Uncertainty
Hatcher Decision Architecture

Adapting Advertising to Audience Uncertainty
Rethinking Advertising When Audiences Hesitate
This portfolio summary introduces the purpose of the work. Full guides and internal working materials remain private.
Explore the audience and communications challenges that give this area of practice its context.